SCANNING INTO THE NIGERIA-BIAFRA CIVIL WAR

Biafra the fatherland. how the people are very happy in Biafra this is what I call fatherland. no one in Nigeria not even those thieves who called themselves politicians love or have Nigeria in their heart.they are just after what they profits from corruption. Nigeria is just a camouflage. in Biafra we stand. God bless Biafra

Biafra Vs Nigeria War. That is misleading. The war that took place was Biafra - Britain/Soviet Union War. If the war was Biafra - Nigeria War there clearly would have been a different result. A country like Biafra engaged in a fight against two super powers would hardly be a successful experience. Children were deliberately starved to death all because of evil intentions. Because the Devil is real and evil exist good will always have to fight evil. Does that mean that good can sometimes be subjugated by more powerful bad or evil intentions and motives. No - In the Judeo-Christianity that is hardly the case. A young David armed with only a small stone was able to defeat a heavily armed Goliath and his army. Sometimes the good can temporarily be set back by evil. But it is not permanent. Biafrans cannot not give up their right to rule themselves in their own country regardless of any external countries, or Satan itself that wants to force them to give up their God-given rights.

The Biafra - Nigeria conflict was a very unfortunate event and a continuation of enslavement of blacks - neocolonialism. There is new creation of slavery - some are made house slaves and some are made field slaves. The conflict was more than blacks against blacks. There was the deceptive doctrine of the conflict being "internal affair" and of no concern to the international community. It was an international affair. Almost all the European powers were enmeshed in it one way or another. The sides taken were strange. Politically Britain, Russia and USA were on one side, while France, the Catholic Church(Vatican) and Portugal were on one side. Catholic countries, governments, and leaders were sympathetic to Biafra. May have been the fact that there was probably a larger proportion of Catholics in Biafra. The Ibo-speaking Irish Bishop Shanahan's missionary work in the Ibo areas and beyond had a lot to do with the fast Catholic expansion. The talk of the oil is a bogey. The mostly Muslim Fulani-Hausa were the group that wanted to secede. They were fearful Ibo Christian domination of the country and a subsequent spread of Christianity into their areas. Their attempts for secession were done in combination of the 1966 mass killings of about 30,000 Biafrans to make them to go back to Biafra land. The British likely dissuaded them with promise of more power to the Muslim north over the rest of the country. Oil was not a factor. South Cameroon were also refused the option of full sovereign independence in the UN plebiscite but only the option of merging with either with Cameroon or Nigeria. Biafrans see their campaign for freedom as a God-given dispensation against evil human wishes and are resolute in regaining control of their lives, indigenous territory and sovereignty based on their ancient history as independent and free peoples.

Why is it that British people who are Christians just like Biafrans helped the Nigerian Islamic people to kill and defeated Biafrans? I am a Biafran and I hate the British for this they have done to us. Long life Biafra!